tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8451732028937263624.post3624577655302798141..comments2023-02-24T09:53:32.319-05:00Comments on <a href="http://buy-high-sell-low.blogspot.com/">Gold Stock Prophet</a>: Gold, Crude Oil, and the US DollarUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8451732028937263624.post-18381146337092673862007-12-06T08:45:00.000-05:002007-12-06T08:45:00.000-05:00Hi, Danny,The ticker is SMSI, and the gap opened o...Hi, Danny,<BR/><BR/>The ticker is SMSI, and the gap opened on 8/29/05.<BR/><BR/>Thanks,<BR/><BR/>Chris NJAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8451732028937263624.post-74269997091170784312007-12-05T12:15:00.000-05:002007-12-05T12:15:00.000-05:00Hi Chris,In the example of XGD that was posted, I ...Hi Chris,<BR/><BR/>In the example of XGD that was posted, I would say that the market had closed that gap, and that gap acted as support for the ETF. <BR/><BR/>Even if there had been a 25 cent space between filling the gap, I would say that it was filled. The bid/ask spread for this ETF is around that amount anyway. <BR/><BR/>You should post the ticker sybmol for your stock. I would like to have Gold Stock Prophethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14869884407300757971noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8451732028937263624.post-21309448644606534492007-12-04T23:11:00.000-05:002007-12-04T23:11:00.000-05:00Hi, Danny,This is slightly off the current topic, ...Hi, Danny,<BR/><BR/>This is slightly off the current topic, but I think relevant to your blog and technical analysis in general...<BR/><BR/>On your recent post titled, "60 Minute Gold Charts and Gaps" you asserted that a gap-up from 63.99 was filled when XGD touched 64.00, even though there is still a .01 gap there. Is a gap technically filled in the minds of most traders when it is reduced to .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8451732028937263624.post-77066438395888676952007-12-04T08:04:00.000-05:002007-12-04T08:04:00.000-05:00Hi Milt,Thanks very much for the question. The par...Hi Milt,<BR/><BR/>Thanks very much for the question. The parameters I used for that chart are 21,34,21. And you are right, the standard parameters set by Stockcharts.com will give you a different result.<BR/><BR/>I like the parameters I use because I find that it is less susceptible to whipsaws. The only downside is that it is also less responsive. <BR/><BR/>I also agree with you on your RSI Gold Stock Prophethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14869884407300757971noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8451732028937263624.post-76835198702672986732007-12-03T14:40:00.000-05:002007-12-03T14:40:00.000-05:00The MacD Histogram on your $USD chart is striking....The MacD Histogram on your $USD chart is striking. However I do not get the same read out with the standard parameters on a $USD chart run at Stock Charts (theirs are 12,26,9). Do you mind telling me what are your parameters? Regardless, it is also interesting that the standard 14 day RSI put in a 'clear' positive divergence well above 20 when the $USD hit its most recent low (whereas it pretty Milthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07052149090644028623noreply@blogger.com